ArticleBiodiversity data journal2026
Digitisation of historical specimens from the Hog Island Audubon Camp Natural History Collection, Maine.
Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Natural history collections serve as invaluable records of biological complexity across time and space. However, only a small fraction of these collections has been digitised globally, leaving the majority of specimen data inaccessible for research and digital analysis. Hog Island Audubon Camp, located in Bremen, Maine, United States, is a nature and birding education centre operated by the National Audubon Society's Seabird Institute. It houses a small, but historically valuable natural history collection, primarily used for science education and outreach programmes. By digitising these data, we have increased the research value and accessibility of the collection by enabling scientists to use these records in support of ecological, evolutionary and conservation goals. New information: Between 2022 and 2024, we digitised all specimens in the collection with available occurrence data using Darwin Core (DwC) as our digital standard. In total, 764 records were captured, representing 417 unique scientific names across animal, plant, fungal and chromista specimens. Most specimens originate from the New England region and the tri-state areas of the United States. Notably, over 300 specimens were collected during the 1960s and 1970s, a period when the harmful effects of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) on humans and wildlife were becoming increasingly recognised. The oldest specimens in the collection are five New World warblers collected between 1872 and 1897.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.