Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608158›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2026

Compensatory hallucinogenesis across three neuropsychiatric disorders: a Bayesian account.

Raina Vin, Jordan Galbraith, Rashina Seabury, Hae Young Yi, Gabriela Hernández-Busot, Lucas Oland, Boris Epie, Anne Trainer, Carolyn Fredericks, Albert R Powers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raina VinYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Jordan GalbraithYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Rashina SeaburyYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Hae Young YiYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2121-8366
Gabriela Hernández-BusotYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Lucas OlandYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Boris EpieYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Anne TrainerYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Carolyn FredericksYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-6382
Albert R PowersYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that hallucinations may arise because of an over-reliance on prior knowledge during perception. While best established in psychosis-spectrum illness, data also support the presence of this abnormality in other hallucination-prone neuropsychiatric illnesses that vary in their association with disruption of sensory circuits. In this piece, we ask whether an over-weighting of expectations may be conceived of as a compensatory response to degraded incoming sensory information. We make the case that visual hallucinogenesis across a wide array of neuropsychiatric disorders can be captured within a common Bayesian computational framework, as a compensatory response to sensory signal disruptions at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy. We focus on three specific disorders (Charles Bonnet syndrome, dementia with Lewy Bodies and psychosis) with prominent visual hallucinations and highlight the fact that these disorders describe a spectrum of visual impairment where the overtness and localization of the visual processing disruption is reflected in the characteristics of the emergent visual hallucinations. We examine how discrete sensory disruptions in Charles Bonnet syndrome translate to hallucinations via known circuits, and then how different disruptions in dementia with Lewy Bodies and Schizophrenia may lead to hallucinations with distinct phenomenology, comorbidities and circuit involvement. Finally, we appeal to emerging computational theories to unite these observations under a common conceptual umbrella. Taken together, this work presents a means of understanding how sensory disruptions could interact with other aspects of cognitive and neural architecture to produce hallucinations across neuropsychiatric disease. It is our hope that this framework will help in efforts to identify pathophysiologically distinct patient subgroups and new pharmacological and circuit-based interventions.

Indexed as

Bayesian computational frameworkCharles Bonnet syndromedementia with Lewy Bodiespsychosissensory signal disruption

Identifiers

PMID41608158
PMCPMC12835829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.