ReviewBrain communications2026
Compensatory hallucinogenesis across three neuropsychiatric disorders: a Bayesian account.
Review in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that hallucinations may arise because of an over-reliance on prior knowledge during perception. While best established in psychosis-spectrum illness, data also support the presence of this abnormality in other hallucination-prone neuropsychiatric illnesses that vary in their association with disruption of sensory circuits. In this piece, we ask whether an over-weighting of expectations may be conceived of as a compensatory response to degraded incoming sensory information. We make the case that visual hallucinogenesis across a wide array of neuropsychiatric disorders can be captured within a common Bayesian computational framework, as a compensatory response to sensory signal disruptions at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy. We focus on three specific disorders (Charles Bonnet syndrome, dementia with Lewy Bodies and psychosis) with prominent visual hallucinations and highlight the fact that these disorders describe a spectrum of visual impairment where the overtness and localization of the visual processing disruption is reflected in the characteristics of the emergent visual hallucinations. We examine how discrete sensory disruptions in Charles Bonnet syndrome translate to hallucinations via known circuits, and then how different disruptions in dementia with Lewy Bodies and Schizophrenia may lead to hallucinations with distinct phenomenology, comorbidities and circuit involvement. Finally, we appeal to emerging computational theories to unite these observations under a common conceptual umbrella. Taken together, this work presents a means of understanding how sensory disruptions could interact with other aspects of cognitive and neural architecture to produce hallucinations across neuropsychiatric disease. It is our hope that this framework will help in efforts to identify pathophysiologically distinct patient subgroups and new pharmacological and circuit-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.