Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608155›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2026

Low protein diet with personalized support in advanced chronic kidney disease: association with disease progression, dialysis delay and mortality.

Gisella Vischini, Sara Caissutti, Daniele Vetrano, Sara Donini, Paolo Mastromauro, Anna Laura Chiocchini, Anna Vella, Giacomo Magnoni, Irene Capelli, Giorgina Barbara Piccoli and 1 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gisella VischiniNephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-4396
Sara CaissuttiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Daniele VetranoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara DoniniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo MastromauroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna Laura ChiocchiniNephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna VellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo MagnoniNephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Irene CapelliNephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgina Barbara PiccoliNéphrologie et Dialyse, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, Le Mans, France.
Gaetano La MannaNephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite therapeutic strategies to manage comorbidities and risk factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant number of patients continue to progress toward kidney failure. The role of low protein diets (LPDs) in delaying the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) remains a subject of ongoing discussion. Real-world studies offer insights into the risks, implementation and feasibility of LPDs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of a moderate LPD (0.6-0.7 g/kg/day) proposed to all newly referred patients with advanced CKD. Survival and need for dialysis were compared between patients who choose an LPD and those who did not. Follow-up was otherwise identical in both groups. Results: Between January 2021 and December 2023, 110 of 182 patients chose to follow an LPD, while 72 did not. No baseline difference in age, sex, kidney function and comorbidity were observed between the two groups. The decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate was faster in patients not adhering to a diet compared with those who followed it (-2.65 versus -0.89 ml/min/1.73 m Conclusion: When offered the option of an LPD, >60% of patients agreed to and followed it. Choosing an LPD was associated with improved patient and renal survival. While this retrospective study cannot establish a causal relationship, our data provide reassurance regarding feasibility and suggest potential advantages of offering LPDs to unselected patients with CKD who choose this dietary approach.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasedialysiseGFRmalnutritionpre-dialysis

Identifiers

PMID41608155
PMCPMC12836100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.