ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Improved running gait parameter estimation from single foot-mounted IMU data based on refined event detection.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inertial measurement units (IMUs) enable portable gait monitoring, yet their accuracy relies on precise event detection. Conventional algorithms using raw signal peaks often fail during running due to speed variations and diverse foot-strike patterns. Therefore, adaptive detection strategies are required for high precision running gait analysis. Methods: This study proposes MFD-GED (multi-sensor fusion with dynamic gait event detection), a refined method for accurate running gait analysis via a single foot-mounted IMU. To enhance event detection, the framework fuses acceleration- and angular-velocity features and employs a parametric strategy to identify initial contact (IC), terminal contact (TC) and mid-stance (MS), respectively. The algorithm then computes a comprehensive set of gait parameters relevant to running biomechanics assessment. Data were collected from 15 healthy male runners (age: 24.1 ± 1.1 years) performing 10-m running trials. The proposed method was benchmarked against a conventional angular-velocity-based gait-segmentation algorithm (AVGS) and validated using a laboratory reference (LAB) comprising an optical motion-capture and force-plate system. Pearson correlation coefficients (Pearson's r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess concurrent validity, while paired t-tests and Cohen's d were employed to evaluate the performance improvement over the AVGS method. Results: The MFD-GED method demonstrated high concurrent validity against the LAB system (r = 0.743-0.991; ICC = 0.741-0.990). Compared to the AVGS method, systematic bias was reduced for spatial parameters ( Conclusion: This study validates an IMU framework improving running gait detection. Through sensor fusion, MFD-GED enables high-fidelity parameter estimation. While lab-validated for healthy young males, findings affirm its potential running for future gait monitoring tasks, aiming to offer a reliable tool for professionals in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.