ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2025
Visual outcomes for the initial 500 eyes treated with keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) for myopia and myopic astigmatism at a single-site.
Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) has become a widely used corneal refractive surgery. Since its approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there are relatively few studies from large US cohorts that have evaluated visual outcomes beyond one year using KLEx for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Studies are often limited by their small sample size and short follow-up duration. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 577 eyes from 314 patients who underwent KLEx between March 2017 and May 2024 at a single refractive surgery center. Inclusion criteria were myopia between 9.25 and 1.00 D, cylinder up to 3.00 D, and preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), CDVA, manifest refraction, and complications were evaluated at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were also compared to FDA premarket trials and large international cohorts. Results: Of 577 treated eyes, data were available at 3 months for 511 eyes (88.6% follow-up) and 12 months for 440 eyes (76.3% follow-up). Mean spherical equivalent (SEQ) improved from 5.35 ± 1.62 D ( 9.63 to 1.38 D) to 0.04 ± 0.44 D ( 1.88 to 1.88 D) ( Conclusions: KLEx demonstrates predictable and safe correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism over 12 months in a US cohort. Visual outcomes meet or exceed FDA benchmarks and are consistent with published literature, although a potential need for improved cylindrical correction remains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.