ReviewCurrent oral health reports2026
Advances in 3D Printed Scaffolds for Periodontal Regeneration.
Review in Current oral health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of scaffold materials for periodontal therapeutics over two decades (2005-2025): A bibliometric mapping analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Demystifying Nanotherapeutic Modalities: Unravelling the Mysteries from Antibiofilm Mechanisms to Regenerative and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Workflow in Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Personalized Bioceramic Implants.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-Modified (PETG) as a Reusable and Biocompatible Substrate for Cell Culture Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- 3D-Bioprinted Multifunctional Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone-Periodontal Ligament-Root Cementum Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Scaffold-Based Biomaterials for Periodontal Regeneration in Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- From Smart Hydrogel Design to 4D-Printed Scaffolds: Emerging Paradigms in Precision Drug Delivery and Regenerative Wound Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: To compile recent advances in scaffold-guided periodontal regeneration (SGPR) enabled by 3D printing, focusing on innovations in materials, multiphasic/anisotropic design, image-guided personalization, and the spatiotemporal delivery of therapeutic cues. Recent Findings: Composite scaffold systems, extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimetic hydrogels, and ion-releasing ceramics (e.g., Mg/Sr/Ca-phosphates, bioactive glass, among others) enhance osteogenesis, periodontal ligament (PDL) formation, and angiogenesis. Melt electrowriting, extrusion, and inkjet printing enable the creation of patient-specific, multiphasic and anisotropic scaffolds that mimic cementum-PDL-bone interfaces. Controlled release of ions, growth factors, genes, and antimicrobials modulate immunity and microenvironments. Emerging directions include in situ and 4D bioprinting, immuno-instructive and prevascularized constructs, and CAD models derived from clinical imaging, which are essential for manufacturing personalized scaffolds and grafts. Summary: 3D printing is advancing SGPR toward functional, personalized therapies; however, its translation depends on reliable vascularization, immune modulation, long-term mechanics, scalable manufacturing, and clear regulatory and safety pathways. Standardized workflows, hybrid/4D printing, machine-learning-guided design, and rigorous clinical studies are essential to accelerate clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.