Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Automating PINN-based kinematic resolution of robotic joints using robotic process automation frameworks.

Parth Agrawal, Pavithra Sekar, Kush Kumar Kushwaha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parth AgrawalSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pavithra SekarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kush Kumar KushwahaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Robot Process Automation (RPA) tools in modeling and controlling rigid robotic joint motion. PINNs, which integrate physical laws with neural networks, offer a promising solution for solving both forward and inverse problems in robotics, while RPA tools provide the means to automate and streamline these processes. The study discusses various PINN techniques, including Extended PINNs, Hybrid PINNs, and Minimized Loss techniques, developed to address issues such as high training costs and slow convergence rates. By combining these advanced PINN approaches with RPA tools, the research aims to enhance the precision and efficiency of robot control, motion planning, and process automation, particularly in non-linear and dynamic coupling situations. We also examine PDE-Inspired PINNs for motion planning in robot navigation and manipulation by integrating it with ROS using the RPA tool itself for coordinating joints and angle movements, and exploring how RPA can facilitate the implementation of these models in real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

motion planningphysics-informed neural networksrigid robotic joint motionrobot navigationrobot Operating system (ROS)RPA

Identifiers

PMID41608080
PMCPMC12834719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.