ArticleEURASIP journal on audio, speech, and music processing2026
Diffraction perception in L-shaped rooms using virtual reality.
Article in EURASIP journal on audio, speech, and music processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outside of shoebox rooms, acoustic diffraction phenomena are present and can influence important aspects of auditory perception, such as localisation. A simple extension of a shoebox room is an L-shaped room as it introduces a single diffracting edge. This paper presents two experiments carried out in L-shaped rooms in virtual reality. The first investigated whether the inclusion of diffraction modelling influences the perceived plausibility of the acoustic simulation, and the second to what extent newly developed efficient IIR filter diffraction models are equally plausible to the physically accurate Biot-Tolstoy-Medwin-Svensson (BTMS) model. The study compared diffraction of only the direct sound and diffraction of both direct and reflected sound. The results show that the inclusion of diffraction increased the perceived plausibility of the acoustic simulation. A statistically significant increase in plausibility was found by the addition of diffracted reflection paths, but only in the so-called shadow zone. The second experiment determined that the IIR filter diffraction models were similarly plausible to BTMS in 14 of 18 cases with a threshold of 0.5 on a 6-point Likert scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.