ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Real-world adverse event profile and signal characteristics of bevacizumab in glioma: a FAERS-based disproportionality analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bevacizumab is a critical anti-angiogenic therapy for glioma, but its real-world safety profile requires comprehensive characterization beyond clinical trials to effectively manage treatment risks. Methods: This pharmacovigilance study analyzed adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for glioma patients receiving bevacizumab. A disproportionate analysis using multiple analytical methods was conducted to identify significant safety signals. Subgroup analyses stratified by gender and age were performed to explore population heterogeneity. Results: Bevacizumab-related AEs involved multiple system organ classes, with particularly prominent disproportionality signals for vascular disorders, especially hypertension, proteinuria and thromboembolic events such as pulmonary embolism. Most AEs occurred within the early treatment period, but late-onset events, including tumor progression, still accounted for a notable proportion. Subgroup analysis indicated that male patients were at higher risk of overall bleeding and thrombotic events, whereas female patients more frequently reported cognitive impairment and showed stronger signals for severe bleeding subtypes such as intracranial hemorrhage, suggesting sex-specific heterogeneity across bleeding phenotypes. Middle-aged patients bore the greatest burden of reported AEs. Conclusion: This study delineates the adverse event spectrum of bevacizumab in patients with glioma, confirming prominent vascular and renal toxicities and revealing sex- and age-related differences in safety profiles. The findings highlight the need for heightened surveillance of vascular and renal events following bevacizumab exposure and provide hypothesis-generating evidence to inform future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.