ArticleCureus2025
Clinico-Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Single-Row Construct Supplemented With Bone Marrow Vents.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFull-thickness rotator cuff tears are common in aging populations and pose healing challenges and significant re-tear rates due to a variety of factors, especially in large or massive tears. Arthroscopic single-row repair construct, though simpler and cost-effective, has biomechanical limitations. Adding bone marrow vents may improve biological healing via the release of certain growth factors through those vents. This study evaluates the outcomes of this combined approach and factors influencing tendon recovery.
methodsThis prospective study involved 22 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears that were confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and were unresponsive to conservative treatment modalities. Patients underwent arthroscopic single-row repair along with vents created over the greater tuberosity adjacent and lateral to the anatomical footprint using a micro-fracture awl. Outcomes of 21 patients were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores at three months and six months compared with the preoperative score. A follow-up MRI at six months was done to evaluate clinical and radiological healing. One patient was lost to follow-up.
resultsA total of 21 patients were available for follow-up, and a repeat MRI was then performed after a minimum duration of six months. All patients showed significant clinical improvement in the ASES scores. MRI confirmed tendon healing in 20 (95.2%) cases. No demographic or lifestyle factors significantly affected the outcomes. One (4.7%) case developed adhesive capsulitis in the postoperative period that resolved conservatively with medications and physiotherapy, indicating an overall positive result. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair augmented with bone marrow vents offers enhanced outcomes for medium to large rotator cuff tears. Single-row repair has been considered an inferior construct as compared to double-row repair, but augmenting the single row with bone marrow vents has proven to show decreased re-tear rates in multiple studies. While trends suggest younger age and traumatic etiology may favor healing, a statistically significant correlation was limited by the small sample size and a shorter duration of follow-up.
conclusionSingle-row repair of the rotator cuff with bone marrow vents enhances the biological healing effectively. Significant functional improvement indicated with improved ASES score and high tendon healing rates on a follow-up MRI support its use as a reliable and cost-effective technique to gain desirable outcomes in patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm the role of clinical factors that influence long-term outcomes, but our findings have proved to be promising and clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.