ArticleCureus2025
Association of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: An Observational Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) reduces surgical trauma compared to thoracotomy, but postoperative pain and recovery remain important concerns. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising regional anesthesia technique, yet its impact on patient-centered outcomes, such as quality of recovery, remains underexplored.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 54 patients undergoing elective VATS at a tertiary center were included. Patients received either an ultrasound-guided ESPB plus the institutional protocol of general anesthesia with intercostal nerve block (Group A, n=37) or the standard protocol alone (Group B, n=17). The primary endpoint was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours postoperatively, assessed numerically and by severity classification. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospitalization (in days), and numeric pain score at 24 hours postoperatively.
resultsThe mean QoR-15 score was 103.4±2.6, with no significant difference between groups (t=1.04, df=52, Cohen's d=0.31, 95% CI -0.27 - 0.88, p=0.302). However, severity classification analysis showed a significant improvement (U=225.0, Z=-1.97, r=0.27, p=0.049). In Group A, 21.6% (n=8) achieved good/excellent recovery compared to none in Group B, and fewer patients were classified as poor recovery (16.2%, n=6 vs. 29.4%, n=5). No differences were observed in intraoperative and postoperative complications, numeric pain score at 24 hours postoperatively, or length of hospitalization. Importantly, ESPB did not increase anesthesia time or perioperative risk.
conclusionAdding ESPB to multimodal analgesia was associated with a trend toward improved postoperative quality of recovery after VATS, with a higher proportion of patients achieving good-to-excellent QoR-15 scores. These findings suggest that ESPB may be a safe and useful adjunct to enhance recovery after VATS; however, these findings require confirmation in larger randomized studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.