ArticleCureus2025
Outcomes of Non-operatively Managed Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Retrospective, Single-Centre Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Achilles tendon ruptures can be managed surgically or conservatively. Due to the increased risk of post-operative complications, non-surgical management is often preferred. Evidence suggests that non-operative approaches can achieve outcomes comparable to surgical repair. One such approach is the Leicester Achilles Management Protocol (LAMP), which involves immobilisation in a VACOped boot for eight weeks. Patient outcomes following non-operative management are commonly assessed using the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS). In this retrospective study, it is hypothesised that patients managed with the LAMP protocol will report favourable outcomes as measured by the ATRS. Methodology This retrospective cohort study analysed patients who presented and were managed for Achilles tendon rupture at a district general hospital in the West Midlands, UK, between January 2022 and October 2024. Patients aged 18 years and above with confirmed Achilles tendon injuries (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code: S86.0), managed through fracture or elective clinics, were included in the analysis. Data obtained from electronic health records included demographics, comorbidities, management duration, time to rehabilitation, and patient-reported outcomes using the ATRS. ATRS data were collected via telephone interviews conducted by local clinicians and analysed descriptively using frequencies, means, and ranges. Results A total of 53 patients were initially screened for inclusion. Eight patients were excluded following clinic reassessment due to misdiagnosis (no rupture or posterior tibial rupture) or death. Of the remaining 45 patients contacted by telephone, 16 did not respond after two attempts, and one declined participation. The final study cohort comprised 28 patients. The analysis showed that patients were mainly male, with an average age of 52.1 years (range: 29-82). Patient-reported outcome measures showed the mean ATRS was 67.1 (range: 26-100), reflecting a wide variation in self-reported recovery. Conclusion Despite a lower ATRS compared to previous studies with non-operative management, this retrospective study showed that LAMP provides satisfactory functional recovery whilst avoiding operative and post-operative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.