ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Clinical characteristics of acute primary angle closure following COVID-19 during the Omicron outbreak in China.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with diverse ocular manifestations, yet its potential link with acute primary angle closure (APAC) remains poorly characterized, particularly during the Omicron variant wave. The aim of the present study was to explore the clinical characteristics of APAC following COVID-19 infection during the Omicron epidemic period in China. A retrospective comparison was conducted between patients with APAC who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ribonucleic acid within 15 days before APAC onset (post-COVID-19 group; December 2022 to January 2023), and patients with APAC from the same seasonal period before the pandemic (pre-pandemic group; December 2018 to January 2019). The pre-pandemic group comprised 50 eyes of 48 patients, and the post-COVID-19 group comprised 86 eyes of 78 patients. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were compared between the two groups. The post-COVID-19 group exhibited a significantly deeper anterior chamber depth (ACD) and thinner lens. The post-COVID-19 group also exhibited more extensive angle closure with less frequent ciliary body detachment and a lower proportion of patients treated with glucocorticoid eyedrops. Although patients in the post-COVID-19 group presented with a greater ACD than those in the pre-pandemic group, the ACDs of both groups were within the clinically shallow range. This suggests a potential pathophysiological mechanism involving anterior chamber angle obstruction and inflammation, possibly triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection, rather than pure pupillary block. Therefore, it is recommended that ophthalmologists should be vigilant for APAC in patients post-infection with COVID-19, even in those with only moderately shallow anterior chambers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.