ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected Indigenous populations, yet Métis-specific data remain limited. We described COVID-19-related experiences, physical and mental health, health behaviours, and socio-economic wellbeing among Métis people in Alberta (Canada) during the early pandemic. Methods: Results: Overall, 2,439 participants completed the surveys. Confirmed COVID-19 cases were reported by 5% of participants in Wave 1 and 15% in Wave 3. Reports of worsening physical and mental health were less frequent in later phases; yet, across waves, 41% screened positive for depressive symptoms, 47% for anxiety, and 68% for high perceived stress. Food insecurity was reported by 39.4% of participants in Wave 1 and 52.9% in Wave 3. Reduced family time and cultural activities were common, particularly in earlier waves. Reports of financial strain (~56%), racism (~25%), and strong Métis identity (~89%) was similar across waves. Conclusion: Findings highlight ongoing structural inequities influencing Métis health during COVID-19. Despite fewer reports of worsening overall health in later phases, symptom-based measures showed persistently high perceived stress and widespread food insecurity. Métis-led, culturally grounded strategies are needed to address both immediate and long-term determinants of health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.