SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Social determinants of health and
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updating the Prevalence ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the Stomach: Exploring the Role ofExpert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Exploratory metabolomic analysis for identifying systemic signatures ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with helicobacter pylori positivity among patients with gastritis in an endemic region of Pakistan.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a preliminary model forFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to July 2025. Observational studies in human populations were included. SDoH were standardized into binary categories based on pre-defined rules. The prevalence of Results: A total of 57 studies ( Conclusion: SDoH exert a significant influence on Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251102412, CRD420251102412.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.