ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Investigation and control of a suspected outbreak of carbapenem-resistant
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can Artificial Intelligence Transform Early Warning for Antimicrobial-Resistant Outbreak Clones? Approaches, Gaps, and Opportunities: A Scoping Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment of carbapenem-resistant Methods: Patients infected with CRAB from 4 August to 29 August 2023 were included. Epidemiological investigation, environmental hygiene testing and pathogen testing were carried out. The whole genome sequencing and homology analysis were conducted to find out the possible infection source and transmission route, and corresponding control measures were taken in time. Results: Six patients developed CRAB lower respiratory tract infection in the short term, and five of them had similar drug sensitivity results. A total of 21 CRAB were detected from 146 environmental surfaces and the hands of medical staff. Phylogenetic tree and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assessment indicated that the strain identified in Patient B and the simple resuscitation bag belonged to the same phylogenetic clade, but with more than 14 SNP differences. The other five patients and environmental strains constituted a separate clade, exhibiting closer phylogenetic relationships among certain patient strains and environmental strains, as well as among the environmental strains themselves. No new infection cases have occurred since the implementation of preventive and control measures. Conclusion: The CRAB infections in this department did not constitute a nosocomial infection outbreak; however, attention should be directed toward clonal transmission driven by mobile genetic elements. The urine bag drainage valve switch is identified as a potential transmission risk point that warrants special attention. It is imperative to enhance nosocomial infection prevention and control measures, including environmental disinfection, hand hygiene, and patient isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.