Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Housing first for middle aged and older women: the emerging case.

Joanne Bretherton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joanne BrethertonSchool for Business and Society, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the use of Housing First services for women experiencing homelessness, focusing on those aged 35 and over, who have multiple and complex needs. The paper draws on an evidence review and the results of a five-year evaluation of a Housing First for Women pilot project (2015-20) and three-year longitudinal study of two further Housing First services for Women in the UK (2021-24), which centred on the lived experience of women using these services. Four main arguments are advanced. The first is that the original Housing First model from the US and the initial deployments of the Housing First approach in Europe and the UK used a model designed in a context in which the nature and extent of middle aged and older women's homelessness was poorly understood. High fidelity Housing First services were less likely to be fully effective because the original model did not properly account for the level of trauma associated with domestic abuse and violence against women in middle age and later life. The second argument is that there is, on current and emergent evidence, a clear case for developing Housing First that is designed, managed and run by women for women which includes safeguarding as one of its key operating principles. The third argument is that Housing First for Women, with its comprehensive co-productive support and intensive case management, may offer important advantages over Sanctuary Schemes and other services that are designed to counteract middle aged and older women's homelessness that is associated with abuse, violence and multiple and complex needs. The paper concludes by arguing that in order to fully meet the needs of middle aged and older women experiencing long term and repeated homelessness with multiple and complex needs, an integrated and preventative strategy, including preventative approaches like Domestic Abuse Housing Alliance (DAHA) Accreditation and Housing First for Women must be developed. If Housing First for Women is to be effective, it must be situated within a wider integrated strategy to counteract women's homelessness to reach its full potential.

Indexed as

domestic abusehomelessnesshousing firstviolencewomen

Identifiers

PMID41607874
PMCPMC12835368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.