ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Eye tracking as a tool to quantify the effects of CAD display on radiologists' interpretation of chest radiographs.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterizing Visual Neurosurgical Expertise in Brain MRI Visualization Using Eye-Tracking and 3D Fractal Dimension Analysis.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for chest radiographs are widely used; however, concurrent reader displays such as bounding-box (BB) highlights may influence interpretation. This pilot study used eye tracking to examine which aspects of visual search were affected by these factors. Methods: We sampled 180 chest radiographs from the VinDR-CXR dataset: 120 with solitary pulmonary nodules or masses and 60 without. BBs were configured for 80 % display sensitivity and specificity. Three radiologists (with 11, 5, and 1 years of experience) interpreted each case twice-once with BBs visible and once without-after a ≥ 2-week washout. Eye movements were recorded using an EyeTech VT3 Mini. Metrics included interpretation time, time to first fixation, lesion dwell time, total gaze-path length, and lung-field coverage. Outcomes were modeled using a linear mixed model with the reading condition set as a fixed effect and case and reader as random intercepts. Primary analysis was restricted to true positives (n = 96). Results: Concurrent BB display prolonged interpretation time by 4.9 s (p < 0.001) and increased lesion dwell time by 1.3 s (p < 0.001). Total gaze-path length increased by 2076 pixels (p < 0.001), and lung-field coverage increased by 10.5 % (p < 0.001). The time to first fixation was reduced by 1.3 s (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Eye tracking revealed measurable changes in search behavior associated with concurrent BB display during chest radiograph interpretation. These findings support this approach and highlight the need for larger studies across modalities and clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.