Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607861›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026

Eye tracking as a tool to quantify the effects of CAD display on radiologists' interpretation of chest radiographs.

Daisuke Matsumoto, Tomohiro Kikuchi, Yusuke Takagi, Soichiro Kojima, Ryoma Kobayashi, Daiju Ueda, Kohei Yamamoto, Sho Kawabe, Harushi Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daisuke MatsumotoDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Tomohiro KikuchiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Yusuke TakagiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Soichiro KojimaDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Ryoma KobayashiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Daiju UedaMedical AI Promotion Institute Co., Ltd., Life Science Building, 12-9 Nihonbashi Odenmacho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei YamamotoDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Sho KawabeMedical AI Promotion Institute Co., Ltd., Life Science Building, 12-9 Nihonbashi Odenmacho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Harushi MoriDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for chest radiographs are widely used; however, concurrent reader displays such as bounding-box (BB) highlights may influence interpretation. This pilot study used eye tracking to examine which aspects of visual search were affected by these factors. Methods: We sampled 180 chest radiographs from the VinDR-CXR dataset: 120 with solitary pulmonary nodules or masses and 60 without. BBs were configured for 80 % display sensitivity and specificity. Three radiologists (with 11, 5, and 1 years of experience) interpreted each case twice-once with BBs visible and once without-after a ≥ 2-week washout. Eye movements were recorded using an EyeTech VT3 Mini. Metrics included interpretation time, time to first fixation, lesion dwell time, total gaze-path length, and lung-field coverage. Outcomes were modeled using a linear mixed model with the reading condition set as a fixed effect and case and reader as random intercepts. Primary analysis was restricted to true positives (n = 96). Results: Concurrent BB display prolonged interpretation time by 4.9 s (p < 0.001) and increased lesion dwell time by 1.3 s (p < 0.001). Total gaze-path length increased by 2076 pixels (p < 0.001), and lung-field coverage increased by 10.5 % (p < 0.001). The time to first fixation was reduced by 1.3 s (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Eye tracking revealed measurable changes in search behavior associated with concurrent BB display during chest radiograph interpretation. These findings support this approach and highlight the need for larger studies across modalities and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Bounding-box displayChest radiographyConcurrent readerEye-trackingInterpretation time

Identifiers

PMID41607861
PMCPMC12834923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.