SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy of acupuncture in the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with insights.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation of the axial skeleton. Although acupuncture has been investigated as a potential therapeutic option for symptom relief, its efficacy in AS remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for patients with AS, aiming to generate evidence to inform clinical practice. Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. A literature search was performed across 7 databases to identify articles published up to December 25, 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the eligibility criteria were included. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0), and meta-analyses were conducted with RevMan 5.4 software. If high heterogeneity was observed among the included studies, a random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed when necessary. Results: A total of 35 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria of this study. We used 6 indicators to estimate the results of the meta-analysis, all outcomes showed statistically significant improvements, including BASDAI score, BASFI score, ASDAS, VAS score, CRP level, and ESR level. Specifically, the BASDAI score (MD = -1.55, 95% CI: -1.97 to -1.13, Conclusion: Acupuncture (including electroacupuncture, warm acupuncture, and fire acupuncture, etc.) is an effective and safe treatment for AS. However, the evidence base is limited by substantial heterogeneity and the lack of large-scale, high-quality clinical trials. Future research should focus on high-quality multicenter studies and comparative analyses of different acupuncture modalities to optimize the evidence for acupuncture in AS treatment. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42025633263.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.