ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Integrating phase-rectified signal averaging with machine learning to predict stroke-associated infections: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke-associated infection (SAI) adversely affects the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, contributing to poorer functional outcomes and survival. The absence of validated tools for early SAI diagnosis and risk stratification in AIS remains a critical clinical gap. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based prediction model that leverages phase-rectified signal averaging (PRSA) indicators closely linked to SAI pathogenesis for timely risk assessment in emergency settings. Methods: This derivative cohort comprised 392 patients diagnosed with AIS between 2021 and 2023. The variables considered in this study included age, sex, heart rate variability (HRV) parameters, and PRSA parameters. Variable selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm and correlation analysis. Ten machine learning methods were employed to construct the SAI diagnostic model, and its performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), sensitivity, specificity, and an internal validation cohort. The predictive model outcomes were interpreted using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Results: Through variable screening, 16 indicators were identified as independent predictive factors for SAI in AIS patients. Utilizing these indicators, 10 machine learning models were developed. Among the machine learning algorithms, the Categorical Boosting (CAT) model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 91%, sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 92%, F1-score of 74%, and an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.894-0.984). Furthermore, SHAP identified cardiac deceleration capacity (DC) and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission as the primary determinants influencing the predictions of the machine learning models. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms, when integrated with demographic and clinical factors, demonstrated accurate prediction of SAI in patients with AIS. The CAT model exhibited robust performance, highlighting its potential to enhance early detection and treatment in clinical practice. Additionally, PRSA markers may serve as potential targets for preventive interventions, enabling more judicious, timely, and targeted use of antibiotics. This approach opens new avenues for research into the prophylactic management of SAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.