ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2026
Green transplant: A scoping review of sustainability challenges and opportunities in transplantation.
Review in World journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Green transplant refers to the realization of the importance of understanding and improving the environmental footprint of transplantation through sustainable practices. This involves assessing the entire transplantation process including preoperative evaluation, donation, organ and patient transportation, surgery, postoperative recovery, and follow-up. This is a topic that has not been fully addressed yet, but its importance is being increasingly appreciated in surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the carbon footprint associated with transplantation and propose sustainable mitigating solutions. A comprehensive review of the existing literature on transplantation was conducted and supplemented with findings from the broader fields of surgical and perioperative care, given the scarcity of available data. The analysis identified the most involved environmental factors and attempted to offer practical solutions based on current sustainability practices. Notably, no study has yet examined the carbon footprint associated with the entire transplantation procedure. Only five studies have attempted to assess the environmental impact of kidney or liver transplants, but they focused, almost explicitly, on specific steps of the process. By employing an extrapolative methodology from the broader surgical field, we determined that the primary contributors to the environmental impact of transplantation are energy, consumables and materials, anesthesia and pharmaceuticals, transportation, and water. This review offers practical solutions utilizing the 5R framework, emphasizing sustainability to ensure transplantation remains clinically and environmentally relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.