ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2026
Update on diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation.
Review in World journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a leading cause of kidney allograft failure, posing significant clinical and economic challenges. Donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens or non-human leukocyte antigens are critical risk factors for AMR and graft loss. The diagnostic criteria and classification of AMR have evolved considerably over the past three decades, driven largely by the Banff classification. The latest Banff 2022 classification introduced two additional subcategories of "microvascular inflammation, donor-specific antibody-negative, C4d-negative" and "probable AMR". Traditionally, graft monitoring has relied on non-specific markers such as serum creatinine and proteinuria, and the invasive biopsies. Noninvasive tools using blood and urine biomarkers, including cellular assays and molecular profiling, are increasingly being investigated. Technologies such as the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System show promise, with studies reporting 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity in detecting AMR. Treatment of AMR remains inconsistent. Recent advances, including CD38 antibodies, have demonstrated up to 60% efficacy in reversing AMR, while complement inhibition shows potential in severe early cases. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, efgartigimod, fostamatinib, and other novel therapies aim to expand treatment options. These developments highlight the need for well-designed clinical trials to validate biomarkers and therapies and to improve long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.