ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Deciphering reprogramming efficiency in human induced pluripotent stem cells: insights from the generation of 150 cell lines.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing iPSC technology for population-level human disease/traits modeling -where are we?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) revolutionized the field of translational medicine by enabling the reprogramming of adult somatic cells into a pluripotent state. From personalized disease models to innovative cell therapies, iPSCs are poised to play a central role in the future of clinical medicine. iPSCs hold enormous promises due to their ability to self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into all somatic cell types, thus offering patient-specific cellular models and therapeutic options without the ethical constraints of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). iPSCs, which exhibit pluripotency similar to embryonic stem cells, are generated by introducing specific factors into terminally differentiated cells, inducing a shift in their epigenetic and transcriptional landscape, which leads to the reactivation of the pluripotency program of the cells. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying successful reprogramming remain poorly understood. Methods: In this study we performed a statistical evaluation of reprogramming efficiencies of 150 iPSC lines generated in our lab, comparing factors such as the starting somatic cell type, passage number, donor´s health status, donor age and sex, reprogramming methodology, and growth conditions. Results/Discussion: We found that the most relevant factor influencing reprogramming efficiency is the developmental status of the starting cells. While other parameters may exert minor effects, inherent donor-specific biological characteristics appear to play the strongest role in determining reprogramming outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.