ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review comprehensively summarized the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in the management of esophageal cancer. It highlighted the significance of AI-assisted endoscopy in Japan where endoscopy is central to both screening and diagnosis. For the clinical adaptation of AI, several challenges remain for its effective translation. The establishment of high-quality clinical databases, such as the National Clinical Database and Japan Endoscopy Database in Japan, which covers almost all cases of esophageal cancer, is essential for validating multimodal AI models. This requires rigorous external validation using diverse datasets, including those from different endoscope manufacturers and image qualities. Furthermore, endoscopists' skills significantly affect diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that AI should serve as a supportive tool rather than a replacement. Addressing these challenges, along with country-specific legal and ethical considerations, will facilitate the successful integration of multimodal AI into the management of esophageal cancer, particularly in endoscopic diagnosis, and contribute to improved patient outcomes. Although this review focused on Japan as a case study, the challenges and solutions described are broadly applicable to other high-incidence regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.