ReviewAquaculture nutrition2026
Exploring the Potential of Microalgae as Feed Ingredients for Sustainable Aquaculture: A Review of Nutritional and Environmental Benefits.
Review in Aquaculture nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microalgae as Future Foods: Unlocking Their Potential and Overcoming Barriers to Market Adoption and Commercialization.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the Potential of Microalgae as Feed Ingredients for Sustainable Aquaculture: A Review of Nutritional and Environmental Benefits.Aquaculture nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increase and rapid population growth and higher demand for fish are driving the aquaculture industry to rapid expansion. One of the main challenges in aquaculture is to ensure sustainable feeds for fish in different aquaculture systems. Historically, aquafeed ingredients were fishmeal and fish oil, but the increase in price and the decrease in availability have resulted in the utilization of some plant-based aquafeed. One of the most utilized plant-based aquafeed and alternative protein sources is soybean meal (SBM). However, the use of aquafeed high in plant protein affects the growth performance, and the production of SBMs requires arable land and freshwater that could be used for crops for human consumption. The substitute aquafeed must possess valuable content, including protein with essential amino acids and lipids with omega 3 fatty acids, and must be palatable and digestible, and it should have low levels of insoluble carbohydrates, fiber, and heavy metals, as these factors can impact fish growth and health. Focusing on microalgae as sustainable alternative has gained interest because microalgae naturally exist in aquatic food chains, with appropriate biochemical composition that could be suitable for lipid substitute in feed as well as fish oil, rich in proteins, carbohydrates, pigments, and other antioxidants. Microalgae, with this balanced composition and high biomass productivity, are considered as a potential aquafeed that can replace conventional ingredients. In this review, we describe how microalgae inclusion in aquafeed or as alternative to conventional sources is conduct to improve sustainability and quality of aquafeeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.