ArticleCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2025
Proof-of-Concept of Online-Only Enrollment for Collecting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes in Young Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in research in congenital heart disease (CHD) is being increasingly recognized. The resources needed for direct, in-clinic enrollment of study participants are important barriers. Social media enable new ways to interact with potential participants. We aimed to test the feasibility of collecting PRO without direct contact by the research team, with subsequent linkage with the Quebec CHD Registry. Methods: We targeted all patients with CHD aged ≥14 years and parent of a child with CHD aged 5-17 years who received cardiac care in Québec. We disseminated a link to an online survey consisting of 4 PRO instruments on the internet and by displaying in pediatric cardiology waiting rooms. No direct contact by a study team was done. The data were subsequently linked to a clinical registry of >50,000 patients. Results: A total of 160 people accessed the study, of whom 68 signed the consent form. A plateau of enrollment was quickly reached despite reminders. A total of 44 participants provided information for linkage to the clinical registry. The study had an over-representation of severe disease cases and lacked ethnic diversity. The retention rate at 1 year was 25%. Health-related quality of life was consistent with other CHD cohorts, and participants reported good satisfaction with life. Conclusion: Recruiting participants with CHD without direct contact was ineffective at population level. Several factors may explain these results, including a weaker community network among participants than anticipated, apprehension about sharing personal information online, and difficulty effectively targeting participants on the internet.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.