ArticleBio-protocol2026
Correcting Image Distortion in Expansion Microscopy Using 3D-Aligner.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Expansion microscopy (ExM) is an innovative and cost-effective super-resolution imaging technique that enables nanoscale visualization of biological structures using conventional fluorescence microscopes. By physically enlarging biological specimens, ExM circumvents the diffraction limit and has become an indispensable tool in cell biology. Ongoing methodological advances have further enhanced its spatial resolution, labeling versatility, and compatibility with diverse sample types. However, ExM imaging is often hindered by sample drift during image acquisition, caused by subtle movements of the expanded hydrogel. This drift can distort three-dimensional reconstruction, compromising both visualization accuracy and quantitative analysis. To overcome this limitation, we developed 3D-Aligner, an advanced and user-friendly image analysis software that computationally corrects sample drift in fluorescence microscopy datasets, including but not limited to those acquired using ExM. The algorithm accurately determines drift trajectories across image stacks by detecting and matching stable background features, enabling nanometer-scale alignment to restore structural fidelity. We demonstrate that 3D-Aligner robustly corrects drift across ExM datasets with varying expansion factors and fluorescent labels. This protocol provides a comprehensive, step-by-step workflow for implementing drift correction in ExM datasets, ensuring reliable three-dimensional imaging and quantitative assessment. Key features • 3D-Aligner precisely corrects sample drift in expansion microscopy (ExM) datasets, enabling reliable 3D reconstruction and robust quantitative analysis. • Utilizes background feature detection and feature matching across z-planes to achieve nanoscale-precision drift correction. • 3D-Speckler, which is a MATLAB-based software platform, offers a customizable and user-friendly interface. • Outperforms conventional registration tools across varying expansion factors and labeling conditions and is equally applicable to non-ExM datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.