ArticleBio-protocol2026
Reproducible Emu-Based Workflow for High-Fidelity Soil and Plant Microbiome Profiling on HPC Clusters.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate profiling of soil and root-associated bacterial communities is essential for understanding ecosystem functions and improving sustainable agricultural practices. Here, a comprehensive, modular workflow is presented for the analysis of full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicons generated with Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing. The protocol integrates four standardized steps: (i) quality assessment and filtering of raw reads with NanoPlot and NanoFilt, (ii) removal of plant organelle contamination using a curated Viridiplantae Kraken2 database, (iii) species-level taxonomic assignment with Emu, and (iv) downstream ecological analyses, including rarefaction, diversity metrics, and functional inference. Leveraging high-performance computing resources, the workflow enables parallel processing of large datasets, rigorous contamination control, and reproducible execution across environments. The pipeline's efficiency is demonstrated on full-length 16S rRNA gene datasets from yellow pea rhizosphere and root samples, with high post-filter read retention and high-resolution community profiles. Automated SLURM scripts and detailed documentation are provided in a public GitHub repository (https://github.com/henrimdias/emu-microbiome-HPC; release v1.0.2, emu-pipeline-revised) and archived on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17764933). Key features • Implement rigorous quality control (QC) of raw 16S rRNA Nanopore reads and sequencing controls. • Remove plant organelle contamination with a curated Kraken2 database. • Perform high-resolution taxonomic assignment of full-length 16S rRNA reads using Emu. • Integrate downstream statistical analyses, including rarefaction, PERMANOVA, and DESeq2 differential abundance. • Conduct scalable microbiome diversity and functional analyses with FAPROTAX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.