ArticleInternational journal of genomics2026
Design and Validation of a Predictive Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Genes With Differential Expression Driven by DNA Methylation.
Article in International journal of genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and Validation of a Predictive Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Genes With Differential Expression Driven by DNA Methylation.International journal of genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks among the world's most lethal cancers, with the majority of cases diagnosed at advanced stages. Accurate prognostic assessment is therefore essential for HCC management. This study utilized DNA methylation (MDGs) and RNA-sequencing data to develop and validate a predictive model for HCC. Methods: MDG profiles, RNA-seq data, and related clinical information were analyzed. Based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, a prognostic signature was developed via univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses in combination with LASSO regression. Subsequently, a nomogram model was constructed and calibrated using calibration curves. The predictive accuracy of the selected genes was tested through in vitro cellular experiments. In addition, the GDSC dataset was utilized to examine the association between the prognostic signature and drug resistance. Results: Three genes (GLS, TEAD4, and CLGN) were identified and incorporated into the prognostic signature. Low-risk patients exhibited notably improved overall survival (OS) in comparison to high-risk patients. A nomogram model was developed based on clinical variables associated with OS, and its predictive accuracy for OS in individuals with HCC was evaluated via calibration curves. In vitro experiments revealed that the proliferative capacity of cells was notably reduced in the knockout group. The GDSC database was utilized to examine the association between the identified prognostic features and drug resistance. Conclusion: Predictive risk scores were developed based on three candidate MDGs, and a nomogram model was built by integrating clinical variables with these scores. This model can provide personalized prognosis prediction and assess drug resistance among individuals with HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.