ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2026
Extended venous excess ultrasound: A promising addition to point-of-care ultrasound-based venous congestion assessment.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From prognostication to implementation: the next frontier for ultrasound-guided assessment of decongestion.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Effects of Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation on Right Ventricular Functions and Pulmonary Hemodynamics in Superficial Venous Insufficiency.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Role of point-of-care ultrasonography in kidney disease management: A single solution for multiple challenges.World journal of nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic congestion is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and in those at risk of fluid overload. The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) grading system, introduced in 2020, uses Doppler evaluation of the hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins to quantify venous congestion at the bedside. While abnormal venous waveforms have been recognized for years, the formalization of VExUS has provided a structured and clinically meaningful framework, generating widespread academic interest with over 500 citations to date. This article blends current evidence with the author's perspective to review the principles, strengths, and limitations of VExUS and to outline the emerging concept of extended VExUS (eVExUS). VExUS has practical limitations when standard windows are inaccessible or unreliable, such as in patients with cirrhosis, advanced kidney disease, or difficult body habitus. The eVExUS approach addresses these challenges by incorporating additional venous Doppler assessments, including the internal jugular, superior vena cava, femoral, and splenic veins, as well as grayscale-based internal jugular measurements to estimate right atrial pressure when inferior vena cava imaging is suboptimal. While eVExUS offers a more adaptable, individualized strategy, its clinical adoption is still in the early stages. Further studies are required to validate eVExUS, link its findings to patient outcomes, and inform the development of tailored imaging protocols for diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.