Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607623›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2026

Extended venous excess ultrasound: A promising addition to point-of-care ultrasound-based venous congestion assessment.

Abhilash Koratala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abhilash KoratalaDivision of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States. akoratala@mcw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic congestion is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and in those at risk of fluid overload. The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) grading system, introduced in 2020, uses Doppler evaluation of the hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins to quantify venous congestion at the bedside. While abnormal venous waveforms have been recognized for years, the formalization of VExUS has provided a structured and clinically meaningful framework, generating widespread academic interest with over 500 citations to date. This article blends current evidence with the author's perspective to review the principles, strengths, and limitations of VExUS and to outline the emerging concept of extended VExUS (eVExUS). VExUS has practical limitations when standard windows are inaccessible or unreliable, such as in patients with cirrhosis, advanced kidney disease, or difficult body habitus. The eVExUS approach addresses these challenges by incorporating additional venous Doppler assessments, including the internal jugular, superior vena cava, femoral, and splenic veins, as well as grayscale-based internal jugular measurements to estimate right atrial pressure when inferior vena cava imaging is suboptimal. While eVExUS offers a more adaptable, individualized strategy, its clinical adoption is still in the early stages. Further studies are required to validate eVExUS, link its findings to patient outcomes, and inform the development of tailored imaging protocols for diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

CongestionDopplerFluid overloadHeart failurePoint of care ultrasoundRight atrial pressureUltrasoundVenous excess ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41607623
PMCPMC12836067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.