ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2026
Frailty in acute coronary syndrome: From risk stratification to clinical decision-making.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Diagnosis-Personalized Risk Stratification in Contemporary Cardiovascular Medicine.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty is a common condition among older adults presenting with acute coronary syndrome and is recognized as a significant determinant of both short- and long-term outcomes. This literature review summarizes the concept of frailty and the assessment tools most relevant in acute care. We synthesize evidence linking frailty to mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and procedural complications, and highlight how heterogeneity among different frailty assessment tools has limited comparisons between studies and the incorporation of guidelines. For healthcare professionals, we propose a pragmatic approach: Rapid screening at first contact using a simple, validated tool; targeted multi-domain assessment for those with a positive result; and clear integration of frailty status into shared decision-making regarding interventional strategies, discharge planning, and transitional care. We identify key gaps, most notably the lack of randomized trials stratified by frailty, limited implementation research on frailty-guided care pathways, and the need to standardize metrics for cardiac testing and registries. Integrating frailty assessment into routine acute coronary syndrome care holds promise for improved individualized risk prediction and more patient-centered management, but will require coordinated research, clearer reporting standards, and feasible clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.