Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607611›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

The importance of self-care and contextual factors: A process evaluation of a recovery intervention for new nurses.

Majken Epstein, Marie Söderström, Ann Rudman, Philip Tucker, Anna Dahlgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majken EpsteinDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Marie SöderströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Ann RudmanDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Philip TuckerDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Anna DahlgrenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Newly graduated nurses often face demanding working conditions including high workload, stress, and irregular working hours. During the first years of practice, burnout symptoms are common. Recovery, including sleep, can be seen as a key protective factor in the associations between stress, shift work and negative health outcomes. Previously, a proactive, group-based intervention (recovery programme) for new nurses, promoting individual strategies for recovery, decreased burnout and fatigue symptoms post-intervention and showed preventive effects on somatic symptoms over time. To optimise the implementation and outcomes of an intervention, it is important to understand its mechanisms of impact (i.e., Objective: To deepen the understanding of the recovery programme's mechanisms of impact and to explore how its implementation, including participants' opportunities for recovery and the feasibility of recovery strategies, was influenced by the context. Design: Qualitative descriptive design. Participants and setting: Twelve nurses (nine women) who had participated in the intervention at four Swedish hospitals, between 12 and 25 months ( Methods: Semi-structured individual telephone interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The programme's proposed mechanisms of impact, including increased knowledge about sleep, enhanced motivation for behavioural change, and the use of recovery strategies, were confirmed. Motivation to apply recovery strategies was supported by a shift in mind-set regarding the importance of self-care; to improve readability; and follow-up on the behavioural change process during sessions. Contextual factors influencing recovery opportunities and the feasibility of strategies were related to both the work context and the individual. These factors included demanding schedules, extended and disrupted working hours, workload, opportunities for recovery at work, social norms, the organisation of work procedures, private life circumstances, and the deprioritisation of personal recovery needs. Booster sessions and reminders were suggested to facilitate the continued use of recovery strategies after the programme. Conclusions: When supporting nurses in developing individual recovery strategies, it is important to provide opportunities to share experiences with other new nurses and to follow-up on their behavioural change process. Importantly, several organisational factors should also be considered. Organisations should work systematically with the planning and management of working hours that promote recovery, create opportunities for recovery during work shifts, organise work procedures with recovery in mind, and continuously monitor and manage employees' stress and fatigue symptoms. Together, such efforts could promote a social norm that supports recovery. Social media abstract: Nurses' recovery can be supported through knowledge, individual strategies, follow-up, group reflections and organisational adaptations.

Indexed as

NursesOccupational healthPrimary preventionQualitative researchRecoveryShift work scheduleSleep

Identifiers

PMID41607611
PMCPMC12834931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.