Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607579›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2025

Comparative Analysis of Free Flaps with Single versus Dual Venous Anastomosis.

Yousef Shafaei, Alireza Minouee, Reza Vaghardoost, Khatere Isazadehfar, Shahriar Bagheri, Mohammad Dehbozorgi, Mohammad Kashkooli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yousef ShafaeiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza MinoueeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza VaghardoostDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Khatere IsazadehfarCommunity and Preventive Medicine, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Medical Faculty, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Shahriar BagheriMedical School, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Mohammad DehbozorgiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad KashkooliMedical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Free flaps are widely used for reconstructive surgery, with venous anastomosis-single or dual-being critical to flap survival. We compared outcomes between single and dual venous anastomoses. Methods: In a cross-sectional study at Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran, 23 patients undergoing free flap surgery were grouped by venous anastomosis type. Primary outcome was flap survival; secondary outcomes included venous thrombosis, congestion, capillary refill, and reoperation. Confounding variables (age, diabetes, smoking, ASA score) showed no significant differences. Results: Patients with flap failure averaged 38 years; successful cases averaged 34.7 years. Flap success was higher in the dual anastomosis group (90%) than the single group (69.2%), though not statistically significant (P = 0.25). No moderate or severe congestion occurred in the dual group, which also had more cases of bright-colored flaps (58.2% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.05). Capillary refill times were similar across groups. Conclusion: Dual venous anastomosis may reduce venous congestion and improve flap appearance, though its effect on overall flap success and thrombosis was not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Flap survivalFree flapsSurgical outcomesVenous anastomosisVenous congestion

Identifiers

PMID41607579
PMCPMC12842918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.