ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
Granular Machine Learning-Based Computed Tomography Contrast Phase Prediction.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate a machine learning framework that detects intravenous contrast and distinguishes eight granular renal contrast phases on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans to improve renal assessment. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included abdominal CT scans obtained at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2009. In total, 3033 scans from 1017 patients with renal cell carcinoma were included. A ConvNeXt-Femto deep learning (DL) model with dual output heads was trained for contrast detection and renal contrast phase prediction using binary classification and regression objectives, respectively. A random forest (RF) regression model was trained on DL-extracted features to predict 8 fine-grained phases spanning early to late corticomedullary, nephrographic, and pyelographic. Model performance was further evaluated using an internal-external cohort of abdominal CT scans from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, comprising of 8856 series from 4760 patients. Results: The DL classifier detected contrast presence with 100% accuracy. The DL-only regression model reached a mean absolute error of 0.34, compared with 0.29 for the hybrid DL+RF model. Agreement analysis between the models' ensemble and 2 radiologists reported reliability, with κ values of 0.86 for predicting the exact category, 1.00 for neighboring categories, and 0.98 for super-category grouping. Internal-external validation indicated that the model successfully operated across datasets differing in patient cohort and imaging characteristics. Conclusion: This DL+RF framework enables automated granular renal contrast phase discrimination and reduces inter-rater variability, representing a meaningful advancement in artificial intelligence-assisted abdominal CT interpretation and supporting improved patient care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.