ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Speech and music source separation for cochlear implant users: front-end and end-to-end approach.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cochlear implant (CI) is a surgically implanted neuroprosthetic device designed to restore auditory perception in individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss. While CI users generally demonstrate good speech intelligibility in quiet listening environments, their performance significantly declines in the presence of competing sound sources. Moreover, music perception and appreciation remain limited for many CI users. These limitations are largely attributed to the inadequate representation of pitch information, which is critical for both music and speech stream segregation in complex auditory scenes. To address these challenges, source separation techniques have been increasingly employed to enhance target speech and isolate singing voices in music. Previous research has shown that CI users report greater music enjoyment when vocals are enhanced relative to the accompanying background instrumentation. Building on this, recent studies have leveraged deep neural networks (DNNs) as both front-end and end-to-end modules to improve speech intelligibility and music enjoyment for CI users. In the present study, we compare front-end and end-to-end DNN-based source separation approaches for two tasks: speech masked by competing speech and singing music. All implemented pipelines were first evaluated using objective instrumental metrics. Based on these results, the models were subsequently assessed in a listening experiment involving nine bilateral CI users. While the end-to-end pipeline outperformed the front-end pipeline in speech understanding tasks, the front-end approach yielded higher scores in music appreciation questionnaires. These findings support the hypothesis that CI sound coding strategies can be effectively combined with DNN-based source separation models. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the limited performance of end-to-end music source separation in enhancing music perception for CI users may be due to the absence of a dedicated sound coding strategy tailored for instrumental music.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.