Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Speech and music source separation for cochlear implant users: front-end and end-to-end approach.

Sina Tahmasebi, Waldo Nogueira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sina TahmasebiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Waldo NogueiraDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cochlear implant (CI) is a surgically implanted neuroprosthetic device designed to restore auditory perception in individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss. While CI users generally demonstrate good speech intelligibility in quiet listening environments, their performance significantly declines in the presence of competing sound sources. Moreover, music perception and appreciation remain limited for many CI users. These limitations are largely attributed to the inadequate representation of pitch information, which is critical for both music and speech stream segregation in complex auditory scenes. To address these challenges, source separation techniques have been increasingly employed to enhance target speech and isolate singing voices in music. Previous research has shown that CI users report greater music enjoyment when vocals are enhanced relative to the accompanying background instrumentation. Building on this, recent studies have leveraged deep neural networks (DNNs) as both front-end and end-to-end modules to improve speech intelligibility and music enjoyment for CI users. In the present study, we compare front-end and end-to-end DNN-based source separation approaches for two tasks: speech masked by competing speech and singing music. All implemented pipelines were first evaluated using objective instrumental metrics. Based on these results, the models were subsequently assessed in a listening experiment involving nine bilateral CI users. While the end-to-end pipeline outperformed the front-end pipeline in speech understanding tasks, the front-end approach yielded higher scores in music appreciation questionnaires. These findings support the hypothesis that CI sound coding strategies can be effectively combined with DNN-based source separation models. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the limited performance of end-to-end music source separation in enhancing music perception for CI users may be due to the absence of a dedicated sound coding strategy tailored for instrumental music.

Indexed as

cochlear implantsDNNsend-to-end source separationsinging musicspeech

Identifiers

PMID41607401
PMCPMC12835400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.