ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2026
Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks: Why, when, and how?
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal leaks and perforations are severe conditions that require urgent management. While these conditions were traditionally treated surgically, a growing body of evidence suggests that endoscopic treatment may be more suitable in a significant proportion of cases. Furthermore, the evolution of therapeutic endoscopy has led to an increased number of such cases being diagnosed during the initial intervention, providing the opportunity for prompt endoscopic treatment. The decision between endoscopic and surgical therapy, as well as the specific type of endoscopic therapy to use, depends on the type and site of perforation, the timing, and the individual characteristics of each patient. It is essential that clinicians can accurately identify patients who are suitable for endoscopic treatment and those who require surgical intervention. Furthermore, there are many areas where high-quality data on the comparison of different modalities are lacking. This manuscript aims to illustrate the patients for whom endoscopic treatment may be indicated and the modalities that can be used for defect closure and prevention of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.