Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607368›Full record

Observational studyJournal of advanced nursing2026

Factors Associated With Maternal Depression, Anxiety and Mother-Infant Bonding in At-Risk Mothers During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Jamie Qiao Xin Ng, Mahesh Choolani, Liang Shen, Aayisha, Lubna Shah, Shang Chee Chong, Cornelia Ying Ing Chee, Yong Shian Goh, Jancy Mathews, Evalotte Mörelius and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jamie Qiao Xin NgAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8349-6483
Mahesh ChoolaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Liang ShenBiostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
AayishaAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Lubna ShahAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Shang Chee ChongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Cornelia Ying Ing CheeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yong Shian GohHealth and Social Sciences Cluster (Nursing), Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-5397
Jancy MathewsNational University Polyclinics, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Evalotte MöreliusDivision of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan Gunnar ErikssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-2060
Shefaly ShoreyAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-2814

Funding

Ministry of Health -Singapore MOH-001261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt-risk mothers experience disproportionately higher rates of antenatal depression and anxiety, which can hinder mother-infant bonding and adversely affect infant socioemotional development. Despite growing evidence on postpartum mental health, antenatal risk factors among psychosocially vulnerable mothers remain underexplored, particularly in multi-ethnic Asian settings.

aimTo identify factors associated with antenatal depression, anxiety, and maternal-fetal bonding among at-risk mothers.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was nested within an ongoing randomised controlled trial. Two hundred at-risk mothers, defined as single, of low socioeconomic status, referred for psychosocial support, at risk of depression, with adverse childhood experiences, or with a fetus with a congenital malformation, were recruited from outpatient obstetric clinics between February and September 2024. Participants completed online self-administered questionnaires assessing antenatal depression, anxiety, perceived stress, social support, parenting self-efficacy, and maternal-fetal bonding. General Linear Models were used to analyse data and identify factors associated with depression, anxiety, and bonding.

resultsHigher perceived stress was associated with increased depression (β = 0.28, p < 0.001) and anxiety (β = 1.28, p < 0.001) and poorer bonding (β = 0.08, p = 0.02), while greater social support predicted lower anxiety (β = -0.31, p < 0.001). Higher parenting self-efficacy was linked to stronger bonding (β = -0.09, p = 0.06). Younger mothers (β = -2.68, p = 0.025) and Indian mothers (β = 7.46, p = 0.017) were particularly vulnerable to anxiety, whereas post-secondary education was protective against depression (β = -1.44, p = 0.02). Model fit ranged from 0.14 to 0.65.

conclusionPerceived stress, social support, and parenting self-efficacy significantly influenced antenatal mental health and bonding in at-risk mothers. These findings underscore the need for culturally sensitive, nurse/midwife-led interventions that integrate early screening, stress reduction, and empowerment strategies within routine antenatal care to strengthen maternal mental health and early bonding outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: (1) Nurses and midwives play a critical role in screening for antenatal depression and anxiety in mothers with risk profiles highlighted in this study. (2) Culturally responsive nursing practice that demonstrates sensitivity towards sociocultural pressures is needed to provide individualised care. (3) Integration of digital and community-based antenatal education programs could provide more equitable access to care for at-risk mothers who may face barriers to in-person care. IMPACT: (1) Despite having a higher susceptibility for antenatal mental health conditions, risk factors for antenatal depression, anxiety, and maternal-infant bonding have been underexplored in at-risk mothers. (2) Antenatal stress and anxiety are universally associated with depression across risk groups, while maternal self-efficacy and perceived social support serve as key protective factors. (3) The findings from this study suggest the need for early screening and nurse-led interventions that support maternal parenting self-efficacy and stress management to improve maternal mental health outcomes among at-risk mothers. REPORTING

methodSTROBE reporting checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionMother-Child RelationsMothersObject AttachmentPregnancy ComplicationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyRisk FactorsSocial SupportYoung Adultantenatal anxietyantenatal depressionhigh‐risk mothersmother–infant bondingmulti‐stressed mother

Identifiers

PMID41607368
PMCPMC13460957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.