ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2026
Sex-dependent plasticity of adult neural tissue in response to damage.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The plasticity of intact adult neural tissue in the vicinity of neural damage helps restore circuit function. Much remains to be learned about the mechanisms regulating this process and the reported sex differences in recovery outcomes. Here, we present the fly gut and its innervation as a simplified model to address these questions. We show that ingestion of damaging agents triggers a reversible increase in adult enteric neural tissue in females, consistent with growth rather than neurogenesis. This growth can be influenced by gut-derived reactive oxygen species, as suggested by suppression with an antioxidant. Interestingly, males do not display neural plasticity, and masculinization of neurons in females suppresses damage-dependent neural growth. Conversely, feminizing male neurons does not confer plasticity, suggesting that sex-specific cues from surrounding tissues may be required for this response. Blocking plasticity reduces the dextran sulfate sodium-induced increase in defecation and further shortens survival, indicating that female-specific neural plasticity supports both gut function and viability. Together, these findings establish a physiological model to dissect cellular, molecular and sex-dependent regulators of adult neural plasticity relevant to circuit repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.