Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607308›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of anaesthesiology2026

Prophylactic esketamine to reduce postpartum depression in primiparae: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial.

Tiantian Chu, Xiaoling Peng, Keliang Wan, Meihong Li, Tianzhu Liu, Xue Shi, Wenlong Yao, Shiyong Li, Zhiqiang Zhou, Changming Yang and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of anaesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04860661 (Effect of Prophylactic Esketamine on Postpartum Depression in Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04860661 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Prophylactic Esketamine on Postpartum Depression in Cesarean Section: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAilin LuoRan2021 to 2024Enrolled336ConditionsEsketamine, Postpartum DepressionArmsEsketamine, Normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Tiantian ChuFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Geriatric Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Brain Health, and Wuhan Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Anaesthesia, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan (TC, XP, KW, ML, TL, XS, WY, SL, ZZ, AL, AX, FG), Department of Anaesthesiology, Jingmen Central Hospital affiliated to Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen (CY, JK, CW), Department of Anaesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan (HX, JC, ZX), Department of Anaesthesiology, Jingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University, Jingzhou (DL), Department of Anaesthesiology, the People's Hospital of Hanchuan, Hanchuan (XL), Department of Anaesthesiology, the People's Hospital of Jingmen, Jingmen (JH) and Department of Anaesthesiology & Institute of Neuroscience and Brain Diseases, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China (XY).
Xiaoling Peng
Keliang Wan
Meihong Li
Tianzhu Liu
Xue Shi
Wenlong Yao
Shiyong Li
Zhiqiang Zhou
Changming Yang
Heng Xu
Jingjing Kong
Chan Wang
Jing Cheng
Zhenzhen Xu
Dezhan Li
Xin Liu
Junmin He
Xihong Ye
Ailin Luo
Aijun Xu
Feng Gao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum depression (PPD) is a common complication after childbirth, especially in primiparae.

objectivesThis trial sought to evaluate whether prophylactic administration of esketamine during the perinatal period could prevent PPD in primiparae without predisposition to prenatal depression.

designA prospective, double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

settingThree academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Primiparae scheduled for elective caesarean section with an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score less than 10.

interventionsPostnatal women were randomly assigned to receive either i.v. esketamine in a single dose of 0.25 mg kg -1 followed by 80 mg of esketamine as an adjunct to 24-h patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Women in the control group received an equal volume of saline.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the total incidence of PPD within 3 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes included postoperative EPDS scores, numeric rating scale scores, sufentanil consumption, the number of effective presses for postoperative intravenous analgesia and adverse events.

resultsA total of 322 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The total incidence of PPD in the esketamine group (11.59%) was significantly less than the control group (20.89%) [adjusted relative ratio (RR), 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P  = 0.028] as was the incidence at 7 days postpartum (4.89 vs. 15.19%; adjusted RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72; P  = 0.005). However, there were no significant differences in PPD incidence and EPDS scores at 1, 2 and 3 months postpartum, respectively. Several mild central nervous events, such as dizziness (10.98%), hallucination (10.37%) and dissociation (5.49%), were observed during esketamine treatment.

conclusionPeri-operative adjunctive administration of esketamine is relatively safe and can prevent PPD in primi-parae without predisposition to prenatal depression in the short term.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04860661.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumKetamineParityAdultAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledCesarean SectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEsketamineKetamine

Identifiers

PMID41607308
PMCPMC13258103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.