ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
Bayesian Mixed Models Approach to Exploring Resilience: Impact of Stress on Subjective Health and Affects Over Time During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Mixed Models Approach to Exploring Resilience: Impact of Stress on Subjective Health and Affects Over Time During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProfound stressors such as the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the importance of understanding resilience mechanisms and approaches for quantifying them in longitudinal studies.
methodsWe used Bayesian mixed models to analyze resilience dynamics with ordinal dependent variables: subjective physical and mental health, and fear, sadness, and anger. The models included fixed effects for individual stressors and random intercepts for participants, applied to the Gutenberg-COVID-19 cohort study.
resultsThere were 206,912 responses from 7386 participants (mean age 55.09 years, 51.52% women) over one year (Oct 29, 2020 - Oct 25, 2021). Social stressors, such as loss of social contacts, had stronger negative associations with health and negative affects than work-related stress. Subjective health and emotions declined during lockdowns but quickly recovered afterward.
conclusionOur longitudinal study design and mixed-model analysis highlight the role of social stress and encourage further research into protective factors like social support and positive reappraisal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.