ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2026
Self-Management of Chronic Illness Among Chinese Immigrants: An Integrative Review.
Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo advance the understanding of chronic illness self-management among Chinese immigrants in Western countries by synthesising evidence and through the lens of the Middle Range Theory of Self- and Family Management of Chronic Illness.
designIntegrative review following Whittemore and Knafl.
methodsTwo reviewers used Covidence software to screen potential articles. After identifying the sample, reviewers extracted data into a matrix and appraised study quality using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. Reviewers used the constant comparative method to categorise data into categories: (1) facilitators/barriers, (2) processes and (3) outcomes. Findings were then synthesised and mapped to the theory domains. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and ProQuest Central (database inception-August 2025).
resultsOf 3205 records screened, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria with acceptable quality. Personal characteristics/health status, resources/environment, Chinese-Western cross-cultural experiences, family and healthcare systems, and linguistic barriers shaped the processes of Focusing on Illness Needs (developing illness insights, taking ownership of health needs, and health promotion); Activating Resources (Western health care, traditional Chinese practices, community and family support, and blended spiritual resources); and Living with a Chronic Illness (processing emotions, adjusting, integrating, and meaning-making). These processes lead to outcomes including improved disease control, psychological/cognitive well-being, and healthcare utilisation and unintended negative consequences such as emotional burden and delayed care-seeking.
conclusionWhile Chinese immigrants share certain aspects of self-management with Western populations, their approaches are shaped by culturally grounded, family-centred values, traditional health practices, and immigrant experiences, which underscore the need for culturally and contextually sensitive self-management support. The findings also expand the applicability of the guiding theory by identifying new cultural elements. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Nurses can support self-management among Chinese immigrants by developing culturally and linguistically tailored interventions, engaging family members in health education and treatment planning, enhancing accessible digital, community and navigational resources, providing language assistance and strengthening staff training. REPORTING
methodWe used the PRISMA 2020 checklist for adherence to review protocols. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.