ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Predicting water at the protein interface in cryo-EM structures from MD-excess chemical potential.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Advantages of AI for Computational Protein Studies and Looking Ahead at the Next Challenges: Single Structures Are Not Enough.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting the positions of water molecules at the protein interface remains a formidable challenge in structural biology, fueling active research in this field. Here, we present a novel approach based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that utilize statistical thermodynamic signatures of water at protein interfaces that can be used to improve the accuracy of water placement in maps derived by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). We employ an analysis based on the excess chemical potential, or the work to transfer (WT) a water molecule from the bulk to the interface. WT is a measure of the thermodynamic balance between the interaction energy of an interfacial water molecule with the protein and its free energy of interaction with all the other solvent molecules. WT is proportional to the log ratio of the local density of water molecules at the protein interface to the bulk density. Using apoferritin as a benchmark system, we found that 85% of the top 100 water locations with the most favorable excess chemical potential values are observed in one or more structures whose locations were determined from high-resolution cryo-EM maps deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Seventy percent of the top 200 water locations indexed by excess chemical potential were also observed in PDB structures derived from the cryo-EM maps. The MD simulations are performed without experimental density restraints, yet the water positions with favorable WT values correlate strongly with their corresponding position within experimentally defined maps. This work paves the way for the development of a cryo-EM water placement and refinement tool that integrates MD simulations of the excess chemical potential with cryo-EM data for accurate modeling of water networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.