ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026
The paradox of SMURF-less outcomes and its implication for diabetes.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIndividuals without standardized modifiable risk factors (SMuRF), which implicitly include those with diabetes, have been paradoxically reported to experience higher mortality following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aim to clarify the independent impact of diabetes on 30-day mortality after ACS and explore how grouping it with other SMuRF might obscure its true effect. METHODS AND
resultsWe analyzed 70 953 first-time ACS patients using inverse probability weighting to adjust for potential confounding. Mortality within 30 days post-ACS was the primary outcome. Diabetic patients without other SMuRF showed a significantly higher 30-day mortality compared with those without any SMuRF, with relative risks (RRs) of 1.29 for women (95% CI, 1.06-1.57) and 1.40 for men (95% CI, 1.16-1.69). When diabetes was combined with other SMuRF, its impact on mortality was diluted. Diabetic patients who were also smokers had RRs of 1.39 in women (95% CI, 0.92-2.09) and 0.89 in men (95% CI, 0.68-1.17), those with hypercholesterolaemia had RRs of 0.91 in women (95% CI, 0.66-1.25) and 0.75 in men (95% CI, 0.53-1.06) and those with hypertension showed RRs of 1.14 in women (95% CI, 0.99-1.32) and 1.12 in men (95% CI, 0.96-1.31).
conclusionDiabetes independently increases 30-day mortality risk in ACS. Aggregating it with other SMuRF masks this risk due to dilution bias, highlighting the need for individualized risk factor assessment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.