ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding the hallmarks of GLP-1RA weight-loss super-responders.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly recognized as a valuable type of oncology research but extracting fit-for-purpose real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records (EHRs) remains challenging. Manual abstraction from free-text clinical documents, although the gold standard for information extraction, is resource-intensive. RWD generation using natural language processing (NLP) has been limited by performance ceilings and annotation requirements, which recent LLMs improve on. Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, with many opportunities for RWE to expand knowledge of disease and treatment. We evaluate new NLP workflows in abstracting MM-related clinical data fields from de-identified EHRs.
methodsNLP workflows (BERT and Llama-based, using various prompt types) were developed for 12 MM-specific data fields and evaluated with manually curated data from 125 clinical notes. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate characteristics of models and data associated with F1 scores. For 200 randomly selected patients, three illustrative data fields (MM status, transplant status, and extramedullary disease) were extracted with a corresponding timestamp from all patient notes within a 120-day window of the index MM diagnosis date using the best-performing Llama workflow. Abstracted data field labels were then plotted on a timeline to display the frequency with which these data fields are documented in patient records.
resultsAverage F1 across the 12 data fields for the best Llama and BERT workflows was 0.82 and 0.65 respectively. Best workflow performance ranged across the data fields (F1 = 0.59–0.99). Statistical analysis of the results showed model size, inter-rater reliability (IRR), variable type, and prompt design significantly predicted workflow performance, in descending order of significance (p < 0.05).
conclusionPerformance improvements with larger LLMs and chain-of-thought prompting was greater in data fields with greater difficulty of abstraction. IRR can prioritize NLP resources, increasing efficiency of RWD generation without sacrificing data quality. Strategic selection of NLP tool using the proposed framework has the potential to inform planning of RWD generation, ultimately accelerating insights from RWE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.