ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Preferences for end-of-life care in geriatric trauma surgery patients with immobilising fractures - a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of immobilising fractures is increased in elderly individuals. This acute event, combined with subsequent bedriddenness, has been shown to increase mortality by approximately 24% within one year. Despite advanced age, conversations with relatives or treating physicians about the last phase of life are rarely held. The objective of this study is to examine the extent to which elderly individuals have addressed their own end-of-life preferences and made suitable provisions.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in a supraregional trauma centre. Recruitment occurred from May 2023 to May 2024. A descriptive data analysis was performed using a specially designed questionnaire with 25 questions. In addition to demographic parameters, the questionnaire included parameters such as the existence of an advance directive, health care discussions held in the clinical setting, and the preferred place of death.
resultsA total of 138 patients were screened, of whom 51 could be included in the study. The study revealed that a mere 8% (n=4) of respondents had engaged in a discussion regarding preventive care during their initial admission to the clinic. However, it was observed that 51% (n=26) of patients expressed a willingness to participate in such a discussion and that their recent fracture had a direct impact on their inclination to seek preventive consultation. Furthermore, 65% (n=33) of those surveyed expressed a desire to die at home, although 67% (n=22) of them had not disclosed this wish to anyone. The data indicates that 59% (n=30) of individuals have already designated an advance directive and health care proxy, though these documents frequently entail only general wording and have not been thoroughly discussed.
conclusionA significant proportion of patients have already given thought to the place they would prefer to die but without engaging in dialogue with others about this wish. Considering these findings, it is incumbent upon the treating physicians and nursing staff to initiate discussions concerning early care planning, thereby facilitating the articulation of patients' wishes in acute palliative scenarios. This approach ensures that these wishes are duly considered and acted upon.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00031589), Registration date: 03 April 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.