Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Comparative efficacy of two kangaroo care scheduling methods on depressed mood and mental health in birthing parents of preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth is a significant public health issue which has a substantial effect upon postpartum mental health. The implementation of kangaroo care (KC) can have positive effects for both infants and birthing parents. Yet optimal scheduling methods for KC are not yet confirmed and current recommendations may be impractical, and thus not sustainable in this context. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of delivering two different scheduling methods of KC upon the mood (depressed mood) and mental health of birthing parents with preterm infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
methodsA single-blind, randomized, clinical trial with three parallel groups (two intervention and one control) was conducted. The study samples were birthing parent- preterm infant pairs who were discharged from the NICU. Continuous sampling was conducted using six blocks, with 65 pairs allocated to each of the three groups: the scheduled KC group (KC three times daily for a minimum of 30 min per session), the unscheduled KC group (KC as often as desired during the day for a minimum of 30 min per session), and the control group. The intervention spanned four weeks and was executed exclusively in the home setting. The Profile of Mood States Questionnaire (POMS) (depressed mood) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) were completed by participants pre and post intervention.
resultsPost intervention, the mean score of participants' depressed mood as well as the total score and subscale of GHQ-28 in the two intervention groups was statistically and significantly lower than scores in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference identified between the two intervention groups.
conclusionThis is the first study of its kind to compare the effectiveness of two different KC methods delivered to preterm infants. This study was also unique in terms of its time comparisons. Both scheduled and unscheduled KC can be used to improve the mental health of birthing parents with preterm infants. Yet as there is no statistically significant difference in terms of their effectiveness, the promotion of unscheduled KC may be more practical and thus more sustainable in this context.
trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) URL https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/61164 Trial ID IRCT20090810002324N19 Date of first registration 10/05/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.