Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606690›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Training Healthcare Professionals to Deliver a Group-Based Intervention for People Living With Severe Obesity: Lessons From the PROGROUP Feasibility Trial.

Shokraneh Moghadam, Mark Tarrant, Lily Hawkins, Dawn Swancutt, Rod Sheaff, Laura Hollands, Raff Calitri, Jonathan Pinkney, Jenny Lloyd

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Training Healthcare Professionals to Deliver a Group-Based Intervention for People Living With Severe Obesity: Lessons From the PROGROUP Feasibility Trial.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shokraneh MoghadamUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7868-9598
Mark TarrantUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Lily HawkinsUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Dawn SwancuttUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-9935
Rod SheaffUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Laura HollandsUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Raff CalitriUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan PinkneyUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Jenny LloydUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula NIHR200167National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) NIHR201038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGroup-based programmes are increasingly adopted to support people living with obesity, as they have the potential to reduce staff time and costs and enhance motivation and capability for behaviour change. Group-based programmes could also provide members with opportunities to form meaningful social connections. As such, training should equip healthcare professionals to deliver group interventions successfully and be accessible and feasible for them to complete. This study presents how mixed-methods process evaluation data from the feasibility randomised controlled trial of PROGROUP (a group-based weight management intervention for people living with severe obesity) informed optimisation of the PROGROUP training programme.

methodsFive healthcare professionals (facilitators) from three specialist weight management services across the United Kingdom participated in a 4-day remote training programme in preparation for facilitating PROGROUP. Four patient cohorts were subsequently delivered across these services. Training content was informed by psychological theory and included communication and group facilitation skills, as well as physical activity and dietary education, delivered by an expert research and practitioner team. Following intervention delivery, facilitators were interviewed about their experiences of training and delivery. Additional data collection sources included fidelity (to form and content) checklists, audio and video recordings of intervention delivery, and field note summaries from in-person observations and debrief calls. Interview data was analysed thematically.

resultsFidelity findings showed that intervention content was largely delivered as intended across all cohorts (average across cohorts = 68%), with facilitators showing confidence in delivering the educational components of the intervention. However, variability was observed across cohorts, indicating differences in facilitators' ability to deliver flexibly and in line with intervention delivery principles. Facilitators also reported challenges in attending all training days in full and expressed a preference for more self-directed learning. In response, to improve accessibility and delivery fidelity, training was adapted to include self-directed learning and a greater focus on developing the necessary skills and knowledge to facilitate according to intervention delivery principles.

conclusionThis study outlines a process for optimising training for healthcare professionals, with learnings applicable to other group-based healthcare settings. Findings highlight the need for healthcare professionals to develop skills aligned with delivering such interventions with fidelity, to maximise potential effectiveness. A flexible, self-directed training format can enhance feasibility and acceptability, balancing healthcare professionals' needs with intervention requirements, and offers a valuable and novel training resource for those delivering group-based care.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelObesity, MorbidWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdomgroup‐based interventionshealthcare professionalsobesitytrainingweight management

Identifiers

PMID41606690
PMCPMC12852526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.