ArticleGenome biology2026
Resolving clonal evolution and selection of extrachromosomal DNA at single-cell resolution.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extrachromosomal DNA as a platform for epigenetic reprogramming in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- scAmp enables focal gene amplification analysis from single-cell data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Evolution of oncogene amplification across 86,000 cancer cell genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic alterations are a hallmark of cancer, and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) has emerged as a key source of oncogene selection, tumor growth, and drug resistance. The intratumor heterogeneity and clonal selection of ecDNA is, however, poorly understood.
resultsIn this study, we pursue a computational approach that leverages allelic imbalance and outlier expression from standard single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to deconvolve the tumor heterogeneity of ecDNA at the single-cell level (ecSingle). Using this approach, we identify oncogene-carrying ecDNAs in tumor samples at the single-cell level, which we validate using genome sequencing. Moreover, we show the superiority of using single-molecule long-read sequencing in resolving ecDNA. ecDNAs displayed extensive intratumor heterogeneity, including subclonal oncogene-carrying ecDNA in primary tumor cells that segregate with distinct transcriptional cell states. Importantly, we show that a rare ecDNA+ clone in the primary tumor can expand to form dominant clones in relapse tumors.
conclusionsOur study introduces a novel approach to studying ecDNA at the single-cell level, enabling both clonal evolution and transcription cell state analysis. We apply this approach to cancer samples to gain deeper insights into the role of ecDNA in intratumor heterogeneity and cellular plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.