Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606635›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2026

Maternal screening coverage and determinants during facility-based antenatal care in Nigeria: analysis of the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey.

Yusuf Adelabu, Tersur T Saalu, Bosede B Afolabi, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Lenka Beňová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yusuf AdelabuDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Yusuf.Adelabu@lshtm.ac.uk.
Tersur T SaaluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Bosede B AfolabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Aduragbemi Banke-ThomasDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lenka BeňováDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-032486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care (ANC) provides an opportunity for early identification and treatment of pregnancy-related conditions to prevent adverse maternal and foetal outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic and health system factors on maternal screening during ANC remains unclear. We evaluated the coverage and determinants of facility-based ANC use and components related to maternal screening for common pregnancy-related conditions in Nigeria.

methodsUsing data from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey, we estimated the percentage of women aged 15–49 years who reported facility-based ANC for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey. Among them, we estimated the percentage who received care components related to maternal screening (blood pressure measured, and urine and blood samples taken) at least once. We used logistic regression to examine the association between household wealth and 1) facility-based ANC utilisation and 2) screening components of care received. Facility type (private or public sector) was considered as an effect modifier.

resultsAmong the sample of 21,792 women, 72.8% reported facility-based ANC. Most ANC users reported having had their blood pressure measured (95.2%), and their blood (89.3%) and urine samples taken (88.0%). All three screening components were received by 83.4% of facility-based ANC users. Compared to women from the poorest quintile, the richest had significantly higher adjusted odds of having facility-based ANC (aOR 4.25, 95% CI: 3.23 – 5.59) and, among ANC users, of receiving all three screening components (aOR = 3.43, 95% CI: 2.52 – 4.68). The adjusted odds of receiving all three components were 49% lower among women who used private ANC compared to those who used only public providers (aOR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.43 – 0.61). There was no evidence of interaction by facility type.

conclusionWealth inequality is associated with disparities in the utilisation of facility-based ANC and maternal screening. Socio-economically disadvantaged women, who are most in need of maternal health services, face a ‘double penalty’ of deprived ANC use and maternal screening during ANC. Interventions focused on mitigating these disparities can help improve maternal outcomes. Concerted efforts are required to regulate the private facilities and strengthen the public facilities to provide high-quality maternal healthcare services.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMaternal Health ServicesPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedNigeriaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancySocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultAntenatal careCoverageDeterminantsHealth facilityMaternal healthQuality of careScreeningSectorSocio-economic determinantsWealth inequality

Identifiers

PMID41606635
PMCPMC12924446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.