Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606609›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2026

Dual role of intraoperative ultrasound in axillary surgery: enhanced detection and surgical de-escalation in breast cancer.

Adnan Gündoğdu, Merve Aktaş, Sangar Abdullah, Ayhan Alpar, Kübra Ertekin, Feyza Başar, Damiano Gentile, Osman Cem Yılmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adnan GündoğduDepartment of General Surgery, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye. adnangundogdu89@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-3572
Merve AktaşDepartment of General Surgery, Bayburt State Hospital, Bayburt, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-8752
Sangar AbdullahDepartment of General Surgery, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8046-8490
Ayhan AlparDepartment of Radiology, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-706X
Kübra ErtekinDepartment of General Surgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-3447
Feyza BaşarDepartment of Pathology, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6645-2267
Damiano GentileBreast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5223
Osman Cem YılmazBreast Surgery, Private Clinic of Dr. Osman Cem Yılmaz, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8418-0234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative ultrasound (IO-USG) may optimize axillary management in breast cancer surgery. This study evaluated IO-USG’s dual role in preventing unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and identifying additional nodal metastases missed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 314 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SLNB with IO-USG evaluation between January 2019 and December 2023. IO-USG was performed after SLNB to identify suspicious non-sentinel nodes. Patients were categorized into SLNB-only, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), or ALND based on combined SLNB and IO-USG findings.

resultsOf 314 patients, 113 (36%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 201 (64%) underwent upfront surgery. Final surgical management comprised SLNB-only in 244 (77.7%), TAD in 46 (14.7%), and ALND in 24 (7.6%) patients. Among 89 SLNB-positive patients, 68 (76.4%) avoided ALND through IO-USG guidance. IO-USG identified additional axillary metastases in 4 of 225 SLNB-negative patients (1.8%). Molecular subtype analysis revealed no IO-USG positivity in triple-negative cases (0/25), while HR+/HER2- tumors comprised 82.6% of IO-USG-positive cases. At a median follow-up of 33.2 months, no axillary recurrences occurred.

conclusionIO-USG may support personalized axillary management, helping avoid ALND in 76.4% of node-positive patients while identifying additional axillary metastases in 1.8% of SLNB-negative cases. As a complementary technique to standard SLNB, it appears to provide selective utility based on tumor biology.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionAdultAgedAxillaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraoperative CareLymph NodesMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyUltrasonographyAxillary managementBreast cancerIntraoperative ultrasoundSentinel lymph node biopsySurgical de-escalation

Identifiers

PMID41606609
PMCPMC12924507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.